|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Why is it that the Mosler, with a very similar body shape to the Saleen, has less than half the downforce of the Saleen? I would think with a shape like that it would at least be close...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
As far as i know Saleen invested a great amount of time in developing the aerodinamics of the car's bottom. The street version should have one of the best downforce figures in the world because of that bottom diffuser that supposedly runs under the whole undercarriage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
retired
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: retired land
|
Quote:
Also the mosler has less power and weight so if anything it would have too much downforce(+drag) making it slower. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
I read somewhere before that the saleen could actually be drove upside down, and still achieve the same downforce characteristics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boston MA USA
Age: 38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
retired
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: retired land
|
No, the Saleen generates its own weight in downforce at 160Mph, so theoretically at 160mph you could drive it upside down, because the downforce would become upforce when the car is upside down, and hold it on the celing, but as soon as you go below 160 the car would fall down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
retired
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: retired land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Dont u find it weird that retired M Schumacher does not drive a Ferrari Sports car or a super car for that matter, non of the other drivers do either and some have also got $$$$$$$ (milions)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|